On 03/12/12 00:04, Mark Linimon wrote: > With portmgr hat on, I have backed out the removal. However, > the change of default version has been left in. As far as I > understood, that was the point of the -exp run: to change the > default version and find out what would happen _were we to remove_ > the stale ports. > > Apparently, somehow, I didn't communicate this. > > mcl > I didn't actually change the default version 5.12.4 WAS and is the default.
I didn't change the default version b/c as the -exp run showed, something like 6 ports remain to be fixed. The fact that we missed the 'else' (default) case is another story. At this point restoring the old version is going to cause large scale breakage for anyone actually using them though b/c the PERL_LEVEL conditionals are gone. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1024D/DB9B8C1C B90B FBC3 A3A1 C71A 8E70 3F8C 75B8 8FFB DB9B 8C1C Philip M. Gollucci (pgollu...@p6m7g8.com) c: 703.336.9354 Member, Apache Software Foundation Committer, FreeBSD Foundation Consultant, P6M7G8 Inc. Director Operations, Ridecharge Inc. Work like you don't need the money, love like you'll never get hurt, and dance like nobody's watching.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
