On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 04:14:49 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > ... > Right, sorry I didn't catch the point originally from mi@. I was > viewing the issue from a limited angle. Doug pointed out exact > deficiency in my thinking and provided real scenario when it can be a > bummer (that is, if one wants to hold shlib dependency while being > able to chase updates of the leaf ports).
Hm, I guess you missed mi@'s mention of such a scenario a few days ago, in the very same thread that I noted earlier in this discussion: http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2012-February/073262.html -- Sahil Tandon _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
