On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 04:28:21PM -0800, Doug Barton wrote: > On 01/15/2012 23:30, Martin Wilke wrote: > > On Sun Jan 15 23:15:11 2012, Doug Barton wrote: > >> When adding things to ports that duplicate base functionality it is > >> customary to say how they are better than what we already have. :) > > > > As usual Patch are welcome :). > > Yeah, that completely doesn't answer my question. You were the one who > committed this port. Can you please explain why? > > Thanks, > > Doug >
1/ because submitter proposed it to the ports tree, since when are we juging when should go in or not (if maintained) when dealing with port? 2/ because it adds feature tzsetup doesn't have like the Xdialog version? 4/ some people creating their own install media are happy to be able to pick it from the ports 5/ people are now able to easily test/compare both tzsetup/tzdialog which might help if tzdialog is to be proposed directly in base. Do we really need more reasons ? regards, Bapt
pgpXVnDwh7a9d.pgp
Description: PGP signature
