On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 02:42:41AM +0000, Martin Wilke wrote: > On Sat Nov 19 18:39:26 2011, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > >I believe we have a problem with PDF readers: some of such ports are being > >added to `graphics', while others to `print' (after adobe acrobat): > > > > graphics/epdfview > > graphics/gimp-manual-pdf > > graphics/gscan2pdf > > graphics/jpeg2pdf > > graphics/jpg2pdf > > graphics/mupdf > > graphics/pdf2svg > > graphics/rubygem-pdfkit > > graphics/svg2pdf > > graphics/xpdf > > > > print/a2pdf > > print/cups-pdf > > print/fpdf > > print/gspdf > > print/py-pdf > > print/py-trml2pdf > > > >I wonder if better consistency can be reached... > > Feel free to request repocopys :-).
:-) Martin, the problem is not purely technical; I am also quite confused what is the best category for software that deals with pdf/dejavu files. Maybe this thread will spawn a discussion; I'd like to hear what others think about it. ./danfe _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
