On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 02:03:05PM +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > 2011/8/26 Alexey Dokuchaev <da...@freebsd.org>: > > Just replying to a random MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE commit. I have a suggestion > > which I think would help us to fix parallel builds when portmgr@ decides to > > start running -exp runs with forced MAKE_JOBS: every time one of us marks a > > port as MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE, should provide a short comment on the nature of a > > failure. > > > > Perhaps MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE knob could be refactored into something similar to > > other "brokenness" knobs and tought to accept a reason string, while "yes" > > value could still be used for cases when exact cause of breakage is not so > > obvious. > > There's no reason a comment can't be put into MAKE_JOBS_UNSAFE;
Indeed. I just wasn't sure if it's being checked against "yes" or simply if defined. ./danfe _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
