On Tue, 2011-08-09 at 21:16:23 +0100, Chris Rees wrote: > On 9 August 2011 20:43, Doug Barton <do...@freebsd.org> wrote: > > On 08/09/2011 12:18, Chris Rees wrote: > >> On 9 August 2011 17:50, Steven Kreuzer <skreu...@freebsd.org> > >> wrote: > >>> I missed it when I first looked to see if this was a port. I > >>> removed mine from the tree > >>> > >> > >> Would anyone object if I looked at adding danfe's grep suggestion > >> to addport ? We have similar checks in rmport... > > > > Not sure exactly what you're proposing. If you're talking about > > humans looking to see if a port exists already then 'cd /usr/ports > > && make search name=foo' is probably an easier way to do that. > > I was thinking of (like the PRs open for $port of rmport) > > Ports named like ack: textproc/p5-ack > > Are you sure you wish to continue [Y/N]?
I think this is a reasonable idea - please do not be discouraged from trying. Us humans are imperfect, and it would be nice to have another check if it is implemented in a useful manner. Looking forward to the patch. -- Sahil Tandon <sa...@freebsd.org> _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
