On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 19:05:57 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > Sahil Tandon wrote: > >On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 18:38:52 -0500, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > > > >>Sahil Tandon wrote: > >>>On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 22:38:41 +0000, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: > >>> > >>>>stephen 2011-06-16 22:38:41 UTC > >>>> > >>>> FreeBSD ports repository > >>>> > >>>> Modified files: > >>>> astro/orsa Makefile > >>>> Log: > >>>> - Track updated dependency > >>>> - Bump PORTREVISION > >>> > >>>Please remember to bump other ports that are affected by the math/GiNaC > >>>shlib change. > >> > >>Already done. The only other port that uses math/GiNaC is > >>math/octave-forge-symbolic, and that port was updated at the same > >>time as math/GiNaC. > > > >Really? Then was this wrong a few months ago: > > > >http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-ports/2011-March/213042.html > > If you look inside the Makefile of science/mbdyn, it has: > > GINAC "Enable GiNaC-support (not implemented yet)" off > > That is why I decided it wasn't necessary to bump this port's portrevision. > > But now that I think about it, I guess that technically someone > might have decided to build this port with this option set to on, > and maybe I should have checked to see if the port then built even > though it said this option is "not implemented yet". > > This port's maintainer is maho who is one of my mentors, and I did > ask them about this.
OK, thanks for explaining your rationale. My confusions stems from seeing bumps in March that were not present this time around. -- Sahil Tandon <sa...@freebsd.org> _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
