On 2011-06-14 22:41, Chris Rees wrote: > 2011/6/14 Pav Lucistnik <p...@freebsd.org>: >> Maybe I missed something, but why do we need nobody user here, when we >> already have it in default master.passwd on every new installation? >> >> $ grep nobody /usr/src/etc/master.passwd >> nobody:*:65534:65534::0:0:Unprivileged user:/nonexistent:/usr/sbin/nologin >> > > Because the code in bsd.port.mk fails if a group is in GROUPS but not GIDs. > > Of course, I realised as you pointed that out that it's unnecessary, > because the nobody reference isn't in GROUPS, so not parsed by that > code. > > Should I remove the line in UIDs / GIDs? >
I think it's not a bad Idea to have even the default system users in ports/GIDs ports/UIDs. For example the following predefined groups are at the moment not in ports/GIDs - operator - mail But they should go in with this lines to support bacula/postfix/clamav - operator:*:5:bacula - mail:*:6:clamav,postfix _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
