Hi, On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 05:36:26PM +0800, wen heping wrote: > PORTEPOCH was not bumped by me. > > Or you mean I shall bump PORTEPOCH ?
I think you should bump PORTEPOCH as described in http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/porters-handbook/makefile-naming.html#AEN556 But danfe@ said this is unnecessary in this case. -- Sergey A. Osokin o...@freebsd.org > 2011/1/11, Sergey A. Osokin <o...@freebsd.org>: > > Hi, > > > > On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 07:51:57AM +0000, Wen Heping wrote: > >> wen 2011-01-11 07:51:54 UTC > >> > >> FreeBSD ports repository > >> > >> Modified files: > >> devel/rubygem-stringex Makefile distinfo > >> Log: > >> - Revert my last commit to avoid break other ports. > >> > >> Reported by: pgollucci@ > >> > >> Revision Changes Path > >> 1.5 +1 -1 ports/devel/rubygem-stringex/Makefile > >> 1.5 +2 -2 ports/devel/rubygem-stringex/distinfo > >> _______________________________________________ > >> cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list > >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all > >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org" > >> > >> > >> Index: ports/devel/rubygem-stringex/Makefile > >> diff -u ports/devel/rubygem-stringex/Makefile:1.4 > >> ports/devel/rubygem-stringex/Makefile:1.5 > >> --- ports/devel/rubygem-stringex/Makefile:1.4 Tue Jan 11 07:01:33 2011 > >> +++ ports/devel/rubygem-stringex/Makefile Tue Jan 11 07:51:54 2011 > >> @@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ > >> > >> # XXX: datamapper requires exact version ~> > >> PORTNAME= stringex > >> -PORTVERSION= 1.2.0 > >> +PORTVERSION= 1.1.0 > >> PORTEPOCH= 1 > > > > Does this changes (i.e. revert back) make sense to bump PORTEPOCH? > > > > -- > > Sergey A. Osokin > > o...@freebsd.org > > > > > -- > ???????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????????? _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
