On Thu, 14 Oct 2010 17:51:17 -0400 Wesley Shields <[email protected]> mentioned:
> In all honesty, your insistence on not using 'co-mentor' is the first > I've ever heard of it. I realize that doesn't make it right, but I think > my point that this is a silly debate still stands. But you didn't heard that you should use 'co-mentor' either? It was meant for consistency, so you can later do some automatic processing based on "(mentor)". I don't even know where this string came from: you probably can't find any references to "approved by co-mentor" neither in the committer's guide, or in porter's handbook. I just was surpised to receive no reaction on my first comment both from the committer and the mentor: the "co-mentor" nonsense has continued to be used. Maybe I just missed that, but I didn't heard that we allow each new mentor to invent his own string to put into parenthesis; if it's true, my I'll ask my next mentee to put something like "master" or "god" in place of "mentor", just because I like it better, or nobody told me that I shouldn't do that. -- Stanislav Sedov ST4096-RIPE _______________________________________________ [email protected] mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[email protected]"
