On Sat, 22 May 2010 11:19:16 +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 02:05:42PM +0400, Max Brazhnikov wrote:
> > On Fri, 21 May 2010 22:22:34 +0200, Rene Ladan wrote:
> > > > Yeah, I've also had to explicitly provide path to wxgtk2-2.8-config
> > > > for my CMake-based ports as well. Probably some sort of hack we
> > > > used to employ for sdl12-config is in order; creating symlink seems
> > > > bad since target might be something other than wxgtk2-2.8-config,
> > > > leading to potential conflicts. We have a long record of dealing
> > > > with local differences from the rest of the [GNU/OSS] world in a
> > > > sane ways. :-)
> > >
> > > I've sent a patch for this with ports/146805
> >
> > With this patch cmake/wx-based ports will always try to build with wx-2.8
> > when multiple wx ports are installed, disregarding what ports/user
> > request.
> >
> > Wouldn't better to pass ${WX_CONFIG} for CMAKE_ARGS in bsd.wx.mk, as it
> > does already for CONFIGURE_ARGS?
>
> Hmm. Actually, that's pretty much what people do with their ports to
> hack around this problem (line from one of mine):
>
> CMAKE_ARGS= -DwxWidgets_CONFIG_EXECUTABLE="${WX_CONFIG}"
>
> Maybe we should just += this value to CMAKE_ARGS when appropriate (read:
> when USE_WX) and be done this it?
The issue will be fixed with next update (after freeze over), the patch is
available at
http://people.freebsd.org/~makc/patches/cmake-2.8.2.diff
Max
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "cvs-all-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
