On Tue, Feb 28, 2006 at 07:35:46AM +0100, Christian Brueffer wrote: > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 05:37:42PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 08:19:36PM -0500, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 05:12:04PM -0800, Marcel Moolenaar wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 09:56:24PM +0000, Christian Brueffer wrote: > > > > > brueffer 2006-02-27 21:56:24 UTC > > > > > > > > > > FreeBSD src repository (doc committer) > > > > > > > > > > Modified files: > > > > > share/man/man4 ddb.4 > > > > > Log: > > > > > DDB depends on KDB for some time now. > > > > > > > > That's not true. Option KDB means that you want to have debugging > > > > code included when source contains it. Option DDB means that you > > > > want the DDB debugger backend. You can have DDB without KDB and > > > > vice versa. > > > > > > ISTR DDB doesn't compile without KDB. > > > > I'm not aware of any breakages. I even tested it just now. I quick > > grep for KDB in DDB related sources yields: > > > > 6.x: > > > > % grep KDB */*/db_* ddb/* > > arm/arm/db_interface.c:#ifdef KDB > > ddb/db_main.c:KDB_BACKEND(ddb, db_init, db_trace_self, db_trap); > > > > 7.x: > > > > % grep KDB */*/db_* ddb/* > > arm/arm/db_interface.c:#ifdef KDB > > ddb/db_main.c:KDB_BACKEND(ddb, db_init, db_trace_self, db_trap); > > > > Only arm refers to KDB and it's doing that bogusly. > > > > Well, before committing I build a RELENG_6 kernel with DDB and without > KDB to make sure, and it stopped, telling me that DDB depends on KDB. >
I forgot to say, i386 kernel. Can't test CURRENT right now. - Christian -- Christian Brueffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Key: http://people.freebsd.org/~brueffer/brueffer.key.asc GPG Fingerprint: A5C8 2099 19FF AACA F41B B29B 6C76 178C A0ED 982D
pgpeCl0lzyoPn.pgp
Description: PGP signature
