Dmitry Marakasov píše v pá 22. 01. 2010 v 12:07 +0300: > * Pav Lucistnik (p...@freebsd.org) wrote: > > > Think you want IGNORE here. > > Isn't IGNORE more like for unfixable errors, i.e. when the port is > indended to not work, while BROKEN is for errors which should be > fixed (which is this case)?
BROKEN is reserved for build failures -- we occasionally run a pointyhat
"TRY-BROKEN" run and unmark all ports that successfully _builds_ in it.
--
Pav Lucistnik <p...@oook.cz>
<p...@freebsd.org>
I can't do that, that would make sense.
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
