Kris Kennaway píše v pá 27. 01. 2006 v 16:13 -0500: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2006 at 07:41:01PM +0000, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > | @@ -17,6 +17,9 @@
> > | # Keep this list sorted in the chronological order. New entries must
> > | # be added at the tail.
> > | #
> > | +# If previously removed port gets restored, make sure to delete the
> > relevant
> > | +# line.
>
> It's more than that, though. If an old port is copied to a new
> location and the old location is kept (e.g. upgraded to a later
> version), don't record it here.
Yes, I noticed few records like this, but I failed to come up with a
concise sentence to note this. I blame my lack of English-fu.
Would you mind suggesting a good wording for that?
> e.g the entries relating to emacs -> emacs19, which you didn't remove.
> If you have the emacs port installed, there's no way to tell whether
> it is an old version that should migrate to emacs19, or a new version
> that should stay in emacs.
There is no entry for editors/emacs in the file.
--
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
A spoonful of curry, garlic and mustard helps the medicine go down...
and come straight back up again.
-- JLE on #angband
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
