Gabor PALI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: pg> Hiroki Sato wrote: pg> > moving only the team information into www does not agree with the pg> > reason why we have article/contributors. pg> pg> I see. Well... According to revision 1.1 [1] (by murray and nik): ...
Okay, thanks for the clarification. pg> > And in a long term, maybe we should merge www and doc into a single pg> > repository (like www/en -> doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/htdocs or so) because pg> > of making reuse of information easier. pg> pg> I support it. When do you think this process could be started? Are pg> there any actual obstacles? I think there is no technical issue, but we need discussion about it including if we should migrate the doc/www repo to SVN or not. If there is no major objection and we can reach a consensus, just after 7.1R would be a good timing. pg> > what do you think about adding files including who it is on per pg> > developer basis? [..] Most of member descriptions of teams/hats can pg> > be generated from the files, and also the traditional first commit by pg> > a new committer can be simplified. pg> pg> I am fond of this kind of approach ;) For example, mentors could only pg> send a file like you attached to their mentees to fill up in advance. I pg> would be happy to see something like this. pg> pg> What do you think will be needed to implement this and get the ball rolling? I am working on a prototype which contains actual data and will send it as a patch, so please review it. Thanks. -- | Hiroki SATO
pgpdyO31n9S1O.pgp
Description: PGP signature
