Hello Giorgos, Saturday, June 21, 2008, 2:07:09 AM, you wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Jun 2008 15:17:53 -0700, Colin Percival <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>Murray Stokely wrote: >>> Thanks for adding this. It would be even more useful if this and the >>> security advisory RSS feed included the text of those advisories >>> rather than just the title. Right now they are stored as text files >>> on another host, but it would be great if we could work with security >>> team to store these in a format more amenable to syndication by our >>> RSS feeds. CCing Colin in case he has any thoughts on this, and >>> assuming he doesn't read www commit messages. =) >> >> What would we get by putting the complete advisory text into the RSS >> feeds except a waste of bandwidth? I can understand adding some more >> information (say, the Topic), but throwing in everything seems a bit >> extreme. I don't think we need to add the whole advisory text into the RSS feed. I would vote for adding "Probel Description" and "Impact" parts of the advisory and then a link to the full text. What do you guys think? > How about adding *two* RSS feeds: a 'short' one, with the titles and a > link to the real advisory, and a 'long' one with the full text? I don't like this idea :-) -- Best regards, Daniel mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
