* David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have no objections to this, but doesn't it defeat the whole
> purpose to implement posix_spawn() as a library function that just
> calls fork/exec?

When (if?) applications start to use posix_spawn() we may decide to move
it into the kernel at any time. It should be okay for now.

-- 
 Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
 WWW: http://80386.nl/

Attachment: pgp9iKpeNFRCM.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to