* David Schultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have no objections to this, but doesn't it defeat the whole > purpose to implement posix_spawn() as a library function that just > calls fork/exec?
When (if?) applications start to use posix_spawn() we may decide to move it into the kernel at any time. It should be okay for now. -- Ed Schouten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> WWW: http://80386.nl/
pgp9iKpeNFRCM.pgp
Description: PGP signature