Coleman Kane wrote:

If we chose to do that, then I'd also suggest a compile flag to turn on
"strict POSIX compliance". Then, perhaps some ports-auto-build-box
somewhere could generate a report of the configure scripts that do such
things, and could be used to nag them into fixing this problem.

This could certainly be done, but the requirement is the set of developers to process the output.

> Maybe someone should nag the bash developers...

The bash developers have taken pride in how they have mangled their shell to support C-like syntax.

Kris
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to