On Thu, 8 May 2008, Alexander Kabaev wrote:
On Thu, 8 May 2008 01:55:32 -0400 (EDT)
Daniel Eischen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
FYI, before I commited this change, I looked at how glibc did it.
Their private namespace does not inherit from the GLIBC public
namespace. But perhaps they have other ways of preventing
exactly what kan is trying to avoid.
You looked at sources, I guess, not what gets generated after they run
their AWK script on it.
No, I looked at the awk script, but that's not to say that
I interpreted it correctly ;-)
$ readelf -V /compat/linux/lib/libc-2.3.6.so
...
Version definition section '.gnu.version_d' contains 18 entries:
Addr: 0x0000000000011b40 Offset: 0x011b40 Link: 4 (.dynstr)
000000: Rev: 1 Flags: BASE Index: 1 Cnt: 1 Name: libc.so.6
0x001c: Rev: 1 Flags: none Index: 2 Cnt: 1 Name: GLIBC_2.0
0x0038: Rev: 1 Flags: none Index: 3 Cnt: 2 Name: GLIBC_2.1
0x0054: Parent 1: GLIBC_2.0
...
0x0230: Rev: 1 Flags: none Index: 17 Cnt: 2 Name: GLIBC_PRIVATE
0x024c: Parent 1: GLIBC_2.3.4
--
DE
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
