I'm _not_ objecting, just interested in why. Any references to discussions on this? Are we now safe for future compat or something?
* John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [080505 09:04] wrote: > jhb 2008-05-05 16:03:52 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > include stdio.h > lib/libc/stdio clrerr.c feof.c ferror.c fileno.c getc.c > getchar.c local.h putc.c putchar.c > xprintf.c > Log: > Expose FILE's internals to the world again in all their glory. Restore > all the previous inline optimizations as well. FILE is back to using > __mbstate_t, struct pthread *, and struct pthread_mutex *. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.70 +172 -4 src/include/stdio.h > 1.12 +2 -2 src/lib/libc/stdio/clrerr.c > 1.12 +2 -2 src/lib/libc/stdio/feof.c > 1.12 +3 -1 src/lib/libc/stdio/ferror.c > 1.13 +2 -2 src/lib/libc/stdio/fileno.c > 1.16 +3 -0 src/lib/libc/stdio/getc.c > 1.15 +3 -0 src/lib/libc/stdio/getchar.c > 1.33 +2 -132 src/lib/libc/stdio/local.h > 1.16 +3 -0 src/lib/libc/stdio/putc.c > 1.16 +3 -0 src/lib/libc/stdio/putchar.c > 1.8 +0 -1 src/lib/libc/stdio/xprintf.c -- - Alfred Perlstein _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
