Max Laier wrote:
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 22:31:55 Attilio Rao wrote:
attilio     2008-04-01 20:31:55 UTC

  FreeBSD src repository

  Modified files:
    sys/kern             kern_rwlock.c
    sys/sys              rwlock.h
  Log:
  Add rw_try_rlock() and rw_try_wlock() to rwlocks.
  These functions try the specified operation (rlocking and wlocking)
and true is returned if the operation completes, false otherwise.

hmmm ... I'm certainly missing something here, but what's a possible usecase for these? It seems there is not much you can do if you can't obtain a rw_lock. I can understand the need for sx_try_* where you want to avoid sleeping, but I can't figure out the need for it on a locking primitive that will only spin or wait (not 100% sure about the terminology here). This is especially strange for rw_try_wlock, unless you plan to sleep manually on fail. But then again you'd have a good chance that you have to do it over and over again if timing is unfortunate.

One situation is that try_[rw]lock can be used to bail out completely if you are doing something optional. e.g. you might have code that is doing some optimization like prefetching of data that can be just skipped if the lock (read or write) cannot be immediately obtained.

Kris
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to