On Tuesday 01 April 2008 22:31:55 Attilio Rao wrote: > attilio 2008-04-01 20:31:55 UTC > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/kern kern_rwlock.c > sys/sys rwlock.h > Log: > Add rw_try_rlock() and rw_try_wlock() to rwlocks. > These functions try the specified operation (rlocking and wlocking) > and true is returned if the operation completes, false otherwise.
hmmm ... I'm certainly missing something here, but what's a possible usecase for these? It seems there is not much you can do if you can't obtain a rw_lock. I can understand the need for sx_try_* where you want to avoid sleeping, but I can't figure out the need for it on a locking primitive that will only spin or wait (not 100% sure about the terminology here). This is especially strange for rw_try_wlock, unless you plan to sleep manually on fail. But then again you'd have a good chance that you have to do it over and over again if timing is unfortunate. > The KPI is enriched by this commit, so __FreeBSD_version bumping and > manpage updating will happen soon. > > Requested by: jeff, kris > > Revision Changes Path > 1.37 +49 -0 src/sys/kern/kern_rwlock.c > 1.17 +4 -0 src/sys/sys/rwlock.h -- /"\ Best regards, | [EMAIL PROTECTED] \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
