John Baldwin wrote:

I'm not sure that's quite fair. :) What happened is that his original patch did work fine (and has been in HEAD for a while), but it changed the API, so he did a quick fixup to restore the API in RELENG_6 and missed one file during that subsequent update.

I should have been more clear. I wasn't asking if the change had been tested, I followed the thread where it was discussed for HEAD. What I should have asked is, "Did you test the change in RELENG_6 by at minimum building world and kernel before you committed?" Doing so would have caught the missed file, and avoided breakage in a -stable branch.

Doug

--

    This .signature sanitized for your protection

_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Reply via email to