Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I'm fine with us discussing how committed we are to VFS being a KPI we > don't break in -STABLE branches, but I'm not fine with the claim that > the KPI wasn't broken by this change. If pushed on the breaking the > KPI point, I would come down on the side that says 6.x is a pretty > mature branch at this point, and that breaking the KPI for purely > cosmetic reasons (i.e., caddr_t -> void *) doesn't cut it. I would be > more swayed by an argument involving a necessary KPI change to address > a critical bugfix, such as a race condition that results from a poor > existing interface.
As far as I can tell, David MFCed that patch to avoid merge conflicts with some other patches, but you'll have to ask him for the details. DES -- Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
