Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Delivery-Date: Thu Jan 24 05:00:27 2008
Received: from staring.karels.net ([EMAIL PROTECTED] [206.196.45.1])
by redrock.karels.net (8.13.8/8.13.6) with ESMTP id m0OB0Rb6097199
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:00:27 -0600 (CST)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from mx2.freebsd.org (mx2.freebsd.org [69.147.83.53])
by staring.karels.net (8.11.6/8.11.2) with ESMTP id m0OB0QA08500
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 05:00:26 -0600 (CST)
Received: from hub.freebsd.org (hub.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::36])
by mx2.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 398C833428;
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:58:25 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from hub.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10EE016A419;
Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:58:25 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE46B16A478
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:58:18 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from c00l3r.networx.ch (c00l3r.networx.ch [62.48.2.2])
by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2909C13C4DD
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Thu, 24 Jan 2008 10:58:17 +0000 (UTC)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: (qmail 98697 invoked from network); 24 Jan 2008 10:19:32 -0000
Received: from localhost (HELO [127.0.0.1]) ([127.0.0.1])
(envelope-sender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>)
by c00l3r.networx.ch (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; 24 Jan 2008 10:19:32 -0000
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2008 11:58:21 +0100
From: Andre Oppermann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Kip Macy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Mike Silbersack <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED], cvs-all@freebsd.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet tcp_syncache.c
X-BeenThere: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Kip Macy wrote:
> > So it is clearly open to interpretation.
> No, it is not. RFC1323 was written in 1992 before RFCs contained the
> boiler plate definition of MUST, SHOULD, MAY and so on.
The use of MUST, etc, originated in RFC1122 in 1989. That RFC also
contains this:
1.2.2 Robustness Principle
At every layer of the protocols, there is a general rule whose
application can lead to enormous benefits in robustness and
interoperability [IP:1]:
"Be liberal in what you accept, and
conservative in what you send"
This quote is also on the RFC1122 working group coffee cup on my shelf.
It seems to apply here.
Mike
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
