On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 01:40:17PM -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote: > On Sun, 08 Jan 2006 05:51:21 -0600, Alexey Dokuchaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 09:51:11PM +0000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > >>edwin 2006-01-02 21:51:11 UTC > >> > >> FreeBSD ports repository > >> > >> Modified files: > >> games/glest Makefile > >> Log: > >> broken on 4.x, ignore on 4.x! > > > >I've been under impression that IGNORE should be used when software in > >question builds, but fails to run properly for some reason. If it does > >not build, you should mark it BROKEN. If it's inherently broken (i.e., > >contains architechture-specific non-portable code) then > >NOT_FOR_ARCHS/ONLY_FOR_ARCHS should be used. > > I submitted BROKEN, but he has changed it to IGNORE.
Whish is obviously wrong; you should have probably corrected him in a polite manner. > > >As a side note, IMHO if submitter has freewall login, (and mezz@ does > >have it) one should use it instead of FQN in commit log. > > I personal don't mind both, which I careless. It's just my perfectionism after all. ;-) ./danfe _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
