Ion-Mihai Tetcu píše v ne 01. 01. 2006 v 19:10 +0200: > On Sun, 1 Jan 2006 15:43:35 +0000 (UTC) > Norikatsu Shigemura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > (5) The frequency of INDEX generation on official site is now > > sufficient, recommend to run "portsdb -F" (fetch INDEX from official > > site) instead of "portsdb -U" (make INDEX by yourself) in portsdb(1). > > [1] > > > PR: ports/91164 > > Submitted by: KOMATSU Shinichiro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > (maintainer) Pointed out by: Enrique Matias <cronopios at gmail dot > > com> [1] > > This is a very bad idea; locally generated INDEX contains all > use-defined OPTIONS, etc. while the fetched one contains only the > defaults thus his has the potential to break the wonderful > upward-recursive usage of portupgrade.
How does it breaks upward recursive usage of portupgrade? The contents
of /var/db/pkg are used for that, not INDEX file.
--
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The use of the lavatory is restricted to the train's cat.
signature.asc
Description: Toto je digitálně podepsaná část zprávy
