Coleman Kane wrote:
On 12/26/05, *Olivier Houchard* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>
wrote:
On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 03:17:35AM -0800, Maxim Sobolev wrote:
> Hi,
>
> IMHO this approach is suboptimal, since it depends on user's
ability to
> debug reason of failure of each particular script. I think since
target
> platform allows execution of shared libs by default our emulation
layer
> should do the same without requiring user to set some obscure
sysctls first.
>
> I have prepared a patch to remove that sysctl and make such
behaviour
> default for linux ELF shared libs. Patch can be found here:
>
> http://www.pbxpress.com/~sobomax/linux_et_dynamic.patch
>
> If there are no objections I would like to commit it (also removing
> respective linux.4 delta).
>
> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
>
> Maxim
Hi Maxim,
I see nothing wrong with this patch. If nobody else has an
objection, please
go ahead.
Chears,
Olivier
_______________________________________________
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-src
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"
Do you think this will finally fix the breakage of the gentoo emulation
port? The script that you run to do the initial bootstrapping attempts
to call ld-linux.so (but dies do to not being allowed to exec it).
Yes, it should be fixed now at least if attempt of ld-linux.so execution
is the only obstacle.
-Maxim
_______________________________________________
cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
