In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Doug White writes: >> The proper fix is to put the cookie in the dirent and abandon the >> microoptimization that UFS/FFS stores struct dirent directly on >> the disk. > >It would be nice if you guys could sit down and figure out just which >"proper fix" you want implemented, since everyone seems to have their own >ideas.
I don't think I've seen any other proposals than to put it in dirent where it rightfully belongs. The reason it is not in dirent is that UFS/FFS uses dirent as the layout in directories as a microoptimization. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
