In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> John Baldwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : On Wednesday 09 November 2005 08:56 am, Scott Long wrote: : > Bruce Evans wrote: : > > On Wed, 9 Nov 2005, Warner Losh wrote: : > >> Modified files: : > >> sys/kern subr_power.c : > >> Log: : > >> Kick off the suspend sequence from the keyboard in a SWI rather than : > >> in the hardware interrupt context (even if it is likely just an : > >> ithread). We don't document that suspend/resume routines are run from : > >> such a context and some of the things that happen in those routines : > >> aren't interrupt safe. Since there's no real need to run from that : > >> context, this restores assumptions that suspend routines have made. : > >> : > >> This fixes Thierry Herbelot's 'Trying to sleep while sleeping is : > >> prohibited' problem. : > > : > > Er, SWIs are interrupts too. Trying to sleep in a SWI handler should : > > cause the same message. This commit uses the general taskqueue SWI : > > handler. taskqueue(9) implicitly says that only the taskqueue thread : > > handler can sleep (it gives malloc(M_WAITOK) as an example of something : > > that can only be done in thread context). : > > : > > Bruce : > : > You're right, but sleeping in SWI's has never been enforced. CAM relies : > on it, for better or worse, and until that's fixed it's pointless to : > start enforcing it. : : Well, I don't think we should knowingly go around adding more instances of : it. :) In this case it is really easy to just use taskqueue_thread rather : than taskqueue_swi.
SWI, thread, what's the difference? [*] In this case, nothing bad will happen if we do this in a thread and bad things might happen in the future if we don't. Sounds like a no-brainer: I changed it to taskqueue_thread. Warner [*] That's actually a good question to have answered in the taskqueue man page... I use it as a rhetorical question here... _______________________________________________ cvs-all@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"