In fact, the difference is between "-t" and "-rt":
$ disklabel -t sd0
perc|Automatically generated label:\
:dt=SCSI:se#512:ns#32:nt#64:sc#2048:nc#2143360:\
:su#4294967295:\
:pa#20971520:oa#264192:ta=4.2BSD:ba#0:fa#0:\
:pb#33554432:ob#21235712:tb=swap:\
:pc#4294703103:oc#264192:\
:pd#4294703103:od#0:\
:pe#4240177151:oe#54790144:te=4.2BSD:be#0:fe#0:
$ disklabel -rt sd0
perc|Automatically generated label:\
:dt=SCSI:se#512:ns#32:nt#64:sc#2048:nc#2143360:\
:su#4294967295:\
:pa#20971520:oa#264192:ta=4.2BSD:ba#0:fa#0:\
:pb#33554432:ob#21235712:tb=swap:\
:pc#4294703103:oc#0:\
:pd#4294967295:od#264192:\
:pe#4240177151:oe#54790144:te=4.2BSD:be#0:fe#0:
Given
$ sysctl kern.rawpartition
kern.rawpartition = 3
I deem "-t" output to be correct (and matches what I had in /etc/diskpart)
Cheers,
Patrick
On Sun, Apr 21, 2024 at 07:02:46PM +0100, Patrick Welche wrote:
> With a kernel & userland of 14 April 2024, on amd64, I just did:
>
> # disklabel -rt sd0
> perc|Automatically generated label:\
> :dt=SCSI:se#512:ns#32:nt#64:sc#2048:nc#2143360:\
> :su#4294967295:\
> :pa#20971520:oa#264192:ta=4.2BSD:ba#0:fa#0:\
> :pb#33554432:ob#21235712:tb=swap:\
> :pc#4294703103:oc#0:\
> :pd#4294967295:od#264192:\
> :pe#4240177151:oe#54790144:te=4.2BSD:be#0:fe#0:
>
> and was surprised to see that d no longer was the whole disk. My
> recollection was that peecees were odd and i386/amd64 used d, whereas
> everyone else used c. Has this changed for consistency?
>
> That computer's /etc/disktab contains
>
> perc|PERC H700:\
> :dt=SCSI:se#512:ns#32:nt#64:sc#2048:nc#2143360:\
> :su#4294967295:\
> :pa#20971520:oa#264192:ta=4.2BSD:ba#0:fa#0:\
> :pb#33554432:ob#21235712:tb=swap:\
> :pc#4294703103:od#264192:\
> :pd#4294967295:od#0:\
> :pe#4240177151:oe#54790144:te=4.2BSD:be#0:fe#0:
>
> which shows it was the other way around on 29 April 2021 when the
> disklabel was written.
>
>
> Cheers,
>
> Patrick
