Martin Husemann <mar...@duskware.de> wrote: > [External Email. Be cautious of content] > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2021 at 12:41:47PM -0800, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > > David Holland <dholland-curr...@netbsd.org> wrote: > > > "static volatile sig_atomic_t reap_children;" > > > > I chose int (which is what sig_atomic_t is) for portability. > > No, it is not int - several NetBSD architectures use long.
Sorry, the one I checked as int, but I don't see that it should really matter? int should be the type that any architecture deals with most naturally.
