hello. Is there a reason to lose it? I have some scripts that, I believe, use that compatibility syntax. -thanks -Brian
On Oct 7, 5:22pm, Thomas Klausner wrote: } Subject: dump(8) 4.3BSD syntax } dump still supports, but doesn't document, the 4.3BSD style syntax. } } Is there someone who still finds that useful and thinks it should stay } supported, or is it perhaps time to lose that bit of compatibility? } Thomas >-- End of excerpt from Thomas Klausner
