On Sun, Jun 09, 2013 at 08:52:18PM +0200, Marc Balmer wrote: > > Since all the check would do (as all uid/gid checks) is to say > > "group _gpio > > has changed; please fix manually", it should be absolutely trivial to > > implement. > > Yes, it's easy to implement. But I think we should not do it since the > change in question was in the -current tree for a few days only. > > If no one objects, I will leave stuff as it is.
I would leave it as is. People who object to the number (which sort of includes me actually) can easily change it themselves, or perhaps already did so; most people won't care. -- David A. Holland [email protected]
