Piotr Dobrogost wrote: > > From above one can see we really need them all :) I'd propose to add using > namespace std in all examples and remove all qualifications to std namespace > (std::). I personally would lean the other way, the std:: qualifier makes it far more clear what you are doing and does not pollute the global namespace. You could also consider "using std::memcpy;" etc. to keep the global namespace cleaner.
The headers need to be tidied up for g++ 4.3.0 anyway, it is far stricter on where headers are included and requires the programmer be more specific, From memory the headers in question were cstdlib and cstring and they had to be included in multiple places where they currently are available as a side-effect of another include. Kind regards, Brad Hubbard _______________________________________________ cURLpp mailing list [email protected] http://www.rrette.com/mailman/listinfo/curlpp
