On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 1:34 PM, Piotr Dobrogost <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Jean-Philippe Barette-LaPierre wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 16, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Piotr Dobrogost > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > > > Jean > > > > .inl files are included in headers but sematically they are more > > source then header files. > > I'm writing this because with the previous folder structure I put > > all .inl files in the header section of VC project but now I think > > they would rather be put in the source section of the project. This > > doesn't make any difference in build since there is no build rule > > for them. It's kind of philosophic problem :) > > > I disagree with you. For libraries that would need to include files from > > cURLpp it would be a serious problem not having those files. > > Jean > > I didn't make it clear. I'm not talking about neither deleting/moving these > files nor changing anything in these files. > In VC project tree there are by default two categories of files; source and > header. These are not physical folders but conceptual ones. I was only > refering to conceptual placement of .inl files in the source category rather > than the header category. Nothing in the project tree changes. Nothing in > the way library is used (as always by including all headers from include > folder (which in turn includes all .inl files) changes. > Then, I'm not be able to discuss this issue with you, since I don't know what would be the impacts. What do you think Andrei? > > Regards > Piotr Dobrogost > _______________________________________________ > cURLpp mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.rrette.com/mailman/listinfo/curlpp >
_______________________________________________ cURLpp mailing list [email protected] http://www.rrette.com/mailman/listinfo/curlpp
