Jean-Philippe Barette-LaPierre wrote: > On Sun, Nov 2, 2008 at 12:13 PM, Piotr Dobrogost <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I don't seen any reason to not put them in anonymous namespaces. > However i found it peculiar that you need to need to have one > project that creates only one executable. Aren't you able to > have everything in the same project, but many targets? > > > I could create one .exe for each example but I put them together > into one .exe and can choose which to run by giving the number of > example as the first argument. > The point is someone sooner or later will try to do similar thing > and we could save him a trouble. That's all. > > Looking at this in broader perspective I have a feeling all global > entities used in any compilation unit as a part of implementation > (without showing them in public interface - in the header file) > should be put in anonymous namespace. > > > It seem I didn't saw what exactly you wanted to do. That's completely > okay with me. >
It's nice to see you read posts and care about project. What is the policy of making changes and who makes changes? Regards Piotr Dobrogost _______________________________________________ cURLpp mailing list [email protected] http://www.rrette.com/mailman/listinfo/curlpp
