Patrick Monnerat via curl-library writes: > On 4/26/2020 4:44 PM, Jean-Francois Dockes wrote: > >> Thanks for the CURLOPT_CONNECT_ONLY pointer. > >> > >> Is there something to prevent me from using the resulting socket fd with > >> CURLOPT_OPENSOCKETFUNCTION / CURLOPT_SOCKOPTFUNCTION ? I see that > >> this is a > >> bit convoluted, but it gains me the use of the libcurl URL parsing and > >> connect code instead of DIY. Does it make sense ? Performance is no big > >> issue in my use case. > > Since you are not sensible on performance, I wrote a working example > that does the job in 2 phases: 1 for the connect and 2 for the HTTP > protocol, reusing the socket descriptor from 1. It is then possible to > get the local address between the 2 phases. As it uses > CURLOPT_CONNECT_ONLY, connection reuse does not apply. > > Please find it in attachment.
As mentionned in answer to Ray Satiro, this is largely what I had in mind. You know how it is when you think of a problem at night and wake up ready to write the code ? Well, it's even better when you wake up to code already written :) Thank you so much ! Cheers, J.F. Dockes ------------------------------------------------------------------- Unsubscribe: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: https://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html