Suggested in the free-form field in the roadmap poll.
Years ago implemented this feature as an experiment but it turned out pretty
complicated. If you do X transfers and they have N bytes/sec allowance in
aggregate, it is a hard challange to distribute the available bandwidth on the
transfers in a way that would resemeble a lower bandwidth connection (which I
assume you'd like from such a feature). We can already set bandwith caps per
transfer so this feature is more just a problem to make sure all transfers use
th given bandwidth as good as possible but without starving invididual
transfers...
If someone has thoughts on this, we could discuss!
--
/ daniel.haxx.se | Get the best commercial curl support there is - from me
| Private help, bug fixes, support, ports, new features
| https://www.wolfssl.com/contact/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Unsubscribe: https://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library
Etiquette: https://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
