On 03 Aug 2014 10:53 AM, "Michael Osipov" <1983-01...@gmx.net> wrote: > > Am 2014-08-03 um 10:27 schrieb Dan Fandrich: > >> On Sat, Aug 02, 2014 at 02:18:29PM +0000, Michael Osipov wrote: >>> >>> @@ -180,7 +180,8 @@ FOOTNOTES >>> *1 = requires OpenSSL, GnuTLS, NSS, yassl, axTLS, PolarSSL, WinSSL (native >>> Windows), Secure Transport (native iOS/OS X) or qssl (native IBM i) >>> *2 = requires OpenLDAP >>> - *3 = requires a GSSAPI-compliant library, such as Heimdal or similar >>> + *3 = requires a GSS-API implementation, such as Heimdal, MIT Kerberos or >>> + SSPI (native Windows) >>> *4 = requires nghttp2 and possibly a recent TLS library >>> *5 = requires a krb4 library, such as the MIT one or similar >>> *6 = requires c-ares >> >> >> Minor nit on this one—this implies that SSPI provides a GSS-API implementation. >> This might be slightly clearer: >> >> + *3 = requires a GSS-API implementation such as Heimdal or MIT Kerberos, or >> + SSPI (native Windows) > > > Infact, SSPI is a proprietary GSS-API implemenation but I do understand what you are referring to. I have trouble phrasing this in a unambigious way. > > Is this better: requires a GSS-API implementation (Unix-like OS) such as Heimdal or MIT Kerberos, or SSPI (native Windows)
Or perhaps just say it the other way around: Requires SSPI (native windows), ir a GSS-API implementation such as Heimdal or MIT Kerberos. Or perhaps Dan's latest suggestion is better.
------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
