On Sat, 4 May 2013, Nick Zitzmann wrote: > The documentation at <http://curl.haxx.se/docs/ssl-compared.html> > is missing sections for Windows- and Darwin-native SSL, and also > doesn't mention a few key differences between engines, like > whether they're database-driven or file-driven or both, or their > support for CRL (none, manual, or automatic). I've made some > proposed revisions; can the rest of you take a look and tell me > what you think?
Generally speaking, I like what you've done here Nick... The comparison is a lot more informative and information more useful. However I have a few comments: * Would it be better to state *nix rather than Unix in the platform list? * Do we need to include both Windows CE and NT in the platform list - Does libcurl still compile on CE? Probable answer is yes but I just wanted to raise the question. * I'm not sure about the version number for Secure Channel being "Windows 7". In some respects I would rather see v6.1.7601 as that is the version number for Windows 7 SP1 and covers both Windows 7 and Windows Server 2008 R2 but then maybe it should be v6.2.9200 for Windows 8 and Windows Server 2012 being the latest version of the OS. * Rather than stating "Not present in older versions of OpenSSL" do you know the required version of OpenSSL for TLS SRP? * You're missing a full stop at the end of the QSOSSL details line - "OS/400" should be "OS/400." for consistency ;-) I hope my feedback helps Steve ------------------------------------------------------------------- List admin: http://cool.haxx.se/list/listinfo/curl-library Etiquette: http://curl.haxx.se/mail/etiquette.html
