On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Tomasz Borek <[email protected]> wrote: > Ghodmode, > > What version of Firefox? I had no slowdown on AT-AT. Also:
I'm using FF8, but I think it might be because I'm on Linux. I think I remember hearing something about FF having hardware-accelerated graphics on Windows, but not on Linux. http://www.osnews.com/story/24264/No_Hardware_Acceleration_Firefox_for_Linux_Due_to_Buggy_X_Drivers > > 2011/12/22 Ghodmode <[email protected]> >> >> It seems like Mozilla should have already had enough time to regain >> their place as the superior browser, if they could, but it hasn't >> happened. For sites that incorporate HTML5/CSS3 or a lot of >> JavaScript, Webkit has to be the target platform. >> >> It's disappointing. Firefox has a better plugin / extension architecture. > > > They focused first on memory usage and did that quite well. In Chrome own > test for version 17 (or 16?) Chrome lost to FF8 (or 7?). Can't remember > where I read it, but I read something like this. > > As for market shares - these seem to be divided by region. There are places > where Chrome leads, there are places where FF does. But, you might have had > a different meaning of "superior browser" in mind so... ;-) Chrome/Chromium/Webkit feels faster and has better CSS3 support. That's what I meant. Also, the mobile platform is becoming more important every day and most of the mobile browsers are Webkit based. There are too many differing sources of information about market share. It seems like Chrome adoption is increasing while both IE and FF are decreasing, but I don't really know. > > pozdrawiam, > Tomasz Borek ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [[email protected]] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
