A point I've not seen anyone make here (apologies if I missed some
postings) is that tables are still required for reliable (?) layout in
HTML e-mails. So perhaps it's as well that they be legitimate. It
doesn't mean we are required to use them for layout in browsers.
On 17/03/2011 18:20, Barney Carroll wrote:
...[tables are the only way for]...
• Wrapping contents (achieved with the non-spec zoom in IE and the
hacky .clearfix:after in other browsers)
• Sequence of elements filling the width of their parent
(stubbornella's OOCSS grids.css)
• Vertical alignment control (impossible without scripting as far as I've seen)
--
Tim Dawson
Maolbhuidhe
Fionnphort
Isle of Mull PA66 6BP
01681 700718
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [[email protected]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/