On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:04 PM, Theresa Newman <[email protected]>wrote:
> if you don't wish to cut up images you can position each <a> absolutely > over the large image. give them display block and a height and width > > > That is what he currently has. But empty links are terrible accessibility and I don't see any reason why, if you want a little 16x16 icon to be linked, not to cut it into a 16x16 icon and wrap the link around it. That's not really CSS though, so yes...as was said before, giving the links "display: block" will fix Kevin's problem. -- ----------------------------------------- [email protected] ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [[email protected]] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
