MEM wrote: > 2010/7/4 David Laakso <[email protected]>: > >> Your uri is: <http://www.nuvemk.com/nascer/> >> >> > The minimum resolution that this was planned was to: 1024 x 768; >
Keep in mind that they way it is set now, that users will not be able to access all the items in the left column, and/or they will not see the footer, with or without javascript enabled-- at 1024x768, 1152x870, and 1280x960. In other words, there is a need to somewhat limit the content in the sidebar, or it will not be accessible in short windows. A good way to handle the left column is to set it for now without javascript. IE/7 may impose even more restricted height for that column. Not sure what your plan is for all the content in it, but it may be worth while considering a three column layout something like what Georg has...? <http://www.gunlaug.no/tos/moa_8d.html> > > >> Fwiw, the IE CCs should follow rather precede... >> <link rel="stylesheet" href="Css/Main.css"/> <link rel="shortcut >> icon" href="/favicon.ico"> >> <!--[if lte IE 8]> >> <script type="text/javascript" src="Js/html5.js"></script> >> <![endif]--> >> <!--[if lte IE 7]> >> <link rel="stylesheet" href="Css/MainIe.css" /> >> <![endif]--> >> >> > > Thanks. So first we read the main css, and then, if the browser is of > a given sort "add" additional rules. > Is it like this that we should understand? > Yes. > > >> Best, >> ~d >> > > Thanks a lot. > > > > Márcio > > ~d -- desktop http://chelseacreekstudio.com/ ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [[email protected]] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
