Can we please bottom post or comment inline (like below).
Theresa Mesa wrote:
> How is it inefficient to add html {height: 100.1%} to your CSS, which
> immediately applies this to all pages without so much as a how-do-you-do
> (since you are using an external style sheet)? To me, if you like the
> aesthetics of not having the nav jump back and forth horizontally, it seems
> like the *most* efficient way of doing it. Either the scrollbar is there, or
> it's not. If you are centering your page, you are going to have the problem.
> You don't notice the scroll bar over there on the side unless the height of
> the content makes scrolling necessary. Otherwise, you don't pay attention to
> it.
Very true. The problems with these two pages.
<http://www.applegateelements.com/contact.shtml>
<http://www.applegateelements.com/agreement.shtml>
is one, the very wide header image and two, the wish to have something
centered. I would recommend to Matthew that he has the menu beginning
from the left and remove all of this.
#menu, #menu a {
position:relative;
}
#menu {
border-bottom: 0;
float: left;
left:50%;
margin-bottom:-1px;
margin-top: 40px; /* added to push it well below the header */
padding-bottom: 0;
}
#menu a {
right:50%;
}
#menu a a {
right: 0;
}
> Now you could spend hours (since you are a professed n00b) trying to
> absolutely position the nav
Theresa, wrong Matthew.
> Either that, or don't try to center the page in the browser window. Let it be
> flush left. Then it's a non-issue.
Precisely. It is easy to center a navigation if there are only so many
links.
> Theresa
--
Alan http://css-class.com/
Armies Cannot Stop An Idea Whose Time Has Come. - Victor Hugo
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [[email protected]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
