On Mar 16, 2010, at 1:18 AM, Chris Blake wrote:
> On 16/03/2010, at 12:01 AM, Climis, Tim wrote:
>
>>> 100%px isn't valid, unless my programming mind is tying to make too
>>> much sense.
>>
>> I think that's the problem... His template is putting in 'px' even
>> though he doesn't want one. And he wants to have a width of 100% in
>> spite of it.
>>
>>> Stylesheets should never overwrite a style defined in the actual tag
>> (Unless it's on the user's side).
>>
>> On the other hand, that gave me an idea that may work (completely
>> untested mind you):
>>
>> Invalid styles should be ignored. So, if you specify "width:
>> 100%px" in the inline style, and then width: 100% in the style
>> sheet, it might actually get applied. It would be among the ugliest
>> hacks I've ever seen though.
>>
>> ---Tim
>>
>>
>
> You're right that's what I am trying to do. I will give it a go for
> the sake of experimentation. I may even write "width(px): uglyhack% in
> the joomla backend so that it can't even get a number from it!
>
> style="width: uglyhack%px ;height: 255px;">
Maybe something without ugly hack ?
Both of the following will override the inline style
* possibility one, in your custom.css
selector {width: 100% !important;}
or
* possibility 2, in your custom.css
selector { max-width:100%; min-width:100%; }
Philippe
---
Philippe Wittenbergh
http://l-c-n.com/
______________________________________________________________________
css-discuss [[email protected]]
http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d
List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/
List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html
Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
