>I was asking for a "No, because..." or "Yes, because..." response.
Fair enough. No, because it's not a paragraph, it's an image. A reader (forget humans, just think reading mechanisms, which can include humans) when it sees a <p> expects to see a paragraph of content. Instead it sees an image. The proper markup for that is the <img> tag. If that needs a wrapper, that's what <div> is for (it's for any arbitrary block, as <span> is for any arbitrary string). So, wrenching this over in the direction of CSS, when you want to style an image and perhaps some associated text, the proper thing to style would be a <div> rather than a <p>. It'd be really sweet if HTML had a tag that would encompass not only the graphic itself but also associated content, but I've not seen any stirrings in that direction. Skip Knox Boise State University ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [[email protected]] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ List policies -- http://css-discuss.org/policies.html Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
