Ian Young wrote: > Have a look at Tedd's article on this: > http://sperling.com/examples/zoom/
(Note: Above quote taken from CSS-d email/thread with this Subject line: "Re: [css-d] Can images be dynamically resized proportionally with minand max sizes?" I did not want to thread-jack.) Maybe Tedd can shed more light on this (or others)... The number used was 16. Is that related to default font size for a particular browser? I thought that number changed depending on browser... I would love to setup a site that displayed images at the optimal/default dimensions/resolution, but scaled on zoom. Seems like using 16 may work for some browsers, but not for others. I am pretty picky when it comes to crisp jpgs. Maybe I am not fully understanding the relationship here... I know it can't be that easy! :D For example, if precision is required for a layout (i.e. newspaper-style layout with a lot of unknown content changing on daily basis), should I even think about using EM's for layout? Some of the folks who posted comments in below article/post seem to think that it is not a good idea to use EM's for layout if dealing with images, unknowns, and precision is needed: <http://www.cameronmoll.com/archives/001224.html> Thoughts anyone? :) Many TIA's. M -- Wishlist: <http://snipurl.com/vrs9> Switch: <http://browsehappy.com/> BCC?: <http://snipurl.com/w6f8> My: <http://del.icio.us/mhulse> ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
