www.eswap.com >>Falling back to HTML 4.01 to avoid validating the (lack of) >>"wellformedness" - only 56 errors. That's as good a result as that page >>can get.
I specified the doctype as http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd";> and got the errors down to 20 >>The main part looks like tabular data to me, so I can't see why tables >>should be replaced. After all: that's what tables are for, and the >>result would be much cleaner, leaner and more reliable. I don't use divs for all the tables that I have in my site. For data that is actually tabular, I use a javascript table library. I replaced all the tables which I was using for positioning with div tags. >>I have no idea how much work has gone into that layout, but I think the >>only right thing is to start from scratch. Proper use of meaningful Isn't that rather dramatic. I don't mind putting in the effort for a redesign if that will improve usability. In any case thanks for the feedback and I would appreciate it if you could give me some usability feedback as well. Vineet ______________________________________________________________________ css-discuss [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.css-discuss.org/mailman/listinfo/css-d IE7b2 testing hub -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/?page=IE7 List wiki/FAQ -- http://css-discuss.incutio.com/ Supported by evolt.org -- http://www.evolt.org/help_support_evolt/
